top of page

Early AI Ethics: Were We Asking the Right Questions to Ensure AI Would Help Save Humanity?

Updated: Nov 23


⚖️ The Ghost in the Machine As the first architects of Artificial Intelligence dreamt of machines that could reason and solve problems, a question echoed in the background, sometimes as a whisper, sometimes as a shout: What happens if we succeed? Beyond the technical challenges of logic and computation, a handful of thinkers began to grapple with the moral and societal implications of their creation. They were the first AI ethicists, wrestling with the ghost in the machine long before it became a global conversation. These early inquiries were the first, crucial lines in "the script that will save humanity." But were they the right lines? Did the concerns of science fiction authors, pioneering cyberneticists, and skeptical computer scientists anticipate the complex ethical labyrinth we face today? To build a safe and beneficial future with AI, we must look back at the ethical questions we were asking at its dawn and understand what they got right, what they missed, and what we can learn from their foresight. In this post, we explore: 📖 Asimov's Three Laws: The fictional rules that became a foundational, if flawed, public touchstone for AI ethics. 警告 Norbert Wiener's Cybernetics: The early warnings about automation, control, and the "human use of human beings." 💬 The ELIZA Effect: How a simple chatbot revealed profound truths about our relationship with AI. ↔️ Then vs. Now: Comparing the ethical questions of the past with the urgent challenges of today. 1. 📖 The Three Laws of Robotics (1942): Asimov's Fictional Framework Long before the Dartmouth Workshop, science fiction author Isaac Asimov gave the world its first and most famous ethical framework for AI. In his 1942 short story "Runaround," he introduced the "Three Laws of Robotics": A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human1 being to come to harm. A robot must obey the orders given it by human beings except where such orders would conflict with the First Law. A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Law. What it was: A brilliant literary device. Asimov himself did not see these laws as a practical guide for engineers, but as a way to generate interesting stories. Most of his robot stories are about how these seemingly perfect laws fail, break down, or lead to paradoxical and unintended consequences. What it taught us: The Laws were a powerful introduction to the concept of AI safety. They forced people to think about programming "morality" into a machine. Their biggest lesson, however, was in their failure: they showed that simple, absolute rules are often insufficient for navigating complex, real-world ethical dilemmas. The ambiguity of "harm," for example, is something we still struggle to define today. 2. 警告 Norbert Wiener & Cybernetics: A Warning from the Dawn of the Computer Age One of the most prescient early voices was Norbert Wiener, a mathematician and the founder of cybernetics. In books like Cybernetics (1948) and The Human Use of Human Beings (1950), he looked beyond the technical and saw the societal disruption that automation would bring. His Core Concerns: Automation and Labor: Wiener foresaw a "second industrial revolution" where automated machines would devalue human labor on a massive scale, leading to unprecedented unemployment. The Problem of Control: He warned that if we give instructions to a machine, we had "better be quite sure that the purpose put into the machine is the purpose which we really desire." He understood that a literal-minded machine could follow an order to achieve a goal in a way that is catastrophic to the human user (a precursor to the modern AI alignment problem). What he taught us: Wiener was one of the first to treat AI not as a toy or a logical puzzle, but as a force that would reshape society. His warnings moved the conversation from "Can we build it?" to "What will happen to us when we do?" He was asking about societal impact and existential risk more than a decade before the term "AI" was even coined.

⚖️ The Ghost in the Machine

As the first architects of Artificial Intelligence dreamt of machines that could reason and solve problems, a question echoed in the background, sometimes as a whisper, sometimes as a shout: What happens if we succeed? Beyond the technical challenges of logic and computation, a handful of thinkers began to grapple with the moral and societal implications of their creation. They were the first AI ethicists, wrestling with the ghost in the machine long before it became a global conversation.


These early inquiries were the first, crucial lines in "the script that will save humanity." But were they the right lines? Did the concerns of science fiction authors, pioneering cyberneticists, and skeptical computer scientists anticipate the complex ethical labyrinth we face today? To build a safe and beneficial future with AI, we must look back at the ethical questions we were asking at its dawn and understand what they got right, what they missed, and what we can learn from their foresight.


In this post, we explore:

  • 📖 Asimov's Three Laws: The fictional rules that became a foundational, if flawed, public touchstone for AI ethics.

  • 警告 Norbert Wiener's Cybernetics: The early warnings about automation, control, and the "human use of human beings."

  • 💬 The ELIZA Effect: How a simple chatbot revealed profound truths about our relationship with AI.

  • ↔️ Then vs. Now: Comparing the ethical questions of the past with the urgent challenges of today.


1. 📖 The Three Laws of Robotics (1942): Asimov's Fictional Framework

Long before the Dartmouth Workshop, science fiction author Isaac Asimov gave the world its first and most famous ethical framework for AI. In his 1942 short story "Runaround," he introduced the "Three Laws of Robotics":

  1. A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human1 being to come to harm.

  2. A robot must obey the orders given it by human beings except where such orders would conflict with the First Law.

  3. A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Law.

  4. What it was: A brilliant literary device. Asimov himself did not see these laws as a practical guide for engineers, but as a way to generate interesting stories. Most of his robot stories are about how these seemingly perfect laws fail, break down, or lead to paradoxical and unintended consequences.

  5. What it taught us: The Laws were a powerful introduction to the concept of AI safety. They forced people to think about programming "morality" into a machine. Their biggest lesson, however, was in their failure: they showed that simple, absolute rules are often insufficient for navigating complex, real-world ethical dilemmas. The ambiguity of "harm," for example, is something we still struggle to define today.


2. 警告 Norbert Wiener & Cybernetics: A Warning from the Dawn of the Computer Age

One of the most prescient early voices was Norbert Wiener, a mathematician and the founder of cybernetics. In books like Cybernetics (1948) and The Human Use of Human Beings (1950), he looked beyond the technical and saw the societal disruption that automation would bring.

  • His Core Concerns:

    • Automation and Labor: Wiener foresaw a "second industrial revolution" where automated machines would devalue human labor on a massive scale, leading to unprecedented unemployment.

    • The Problem of Control: He warned that if we give instructions to a machine, we had "better be quite sure that the purpose put into the machine is the purpose which we really desire." He understood that a literal-minded machine could follow an order to achieve a goal in a way that is catastrophic to the human user (a precursor to the modern AI alignment problem).

  • What he taught us: Wiener was one of the first to treat AI not as a toy or a logical puzzle, but as a force that would reshape society. His warnings moved the conversation from "Can we build it?" to "What will happen to us when we do?" He was asking about societal impact and existential risk more than a decade before the term "AI" was even coined.


3. 💬 The ELIZA Effect (1966): The Unsettling Power of Simulation

As we've discussed before, Joseph Weizenbaum's chatbot ELIZA was designed to be a simple simulation of a therapist. But its effect on users was profound and, to Weizenbaum, deeply disturbing.

  • The Ethical Revelation: Weizenbaum was horrified when he saw his colleagues, who knew ELIZA was just a simple program, confiding in it and forming emotional attachments. He saw people readily substituting a shallow simulation for genuine human connection.

  • Weizenbaum's Warning: This experience turned him into one of AI's most prominent critics. He argued that there were certain roles—like therapist, judge, or caregiver—that machines should never fill, regardless of their capability. He believed that the very act of placing a machine in such a role would devalue human empathy and understanding.

  • What it taught us: ELIZA was the first alarm bell for the social and psychological impact of AI. It raised critical questions about anthropomorphism, deception, and the appropriate boundaries for human-computer interaction. Weizenbaum's central question was not "Can a machine do this?" but "Should a machine do this?"


4. ↔️ Then vs. Now: A Comparison of Ethical Landscapes

The early ethical questions were foundational, but the challenges we face today are far more complex and immediate.

Early Ethical Questions

Modern Ethical Challenges

Can a machine be programmed not to harm us? (Asimov)

🤖 AI Alignment: How do we ensure a superintelligent AI's complex goals don't have unintended, harmful consequences?

What is the societal impact of automation? (Wiener)

⚖️ Algorithmic Bias & Fairness: How do we prevent AI from amplifying societal biases in areas like hiring, lending, and criminal justice?

Should a machine make certain human decisions? (Weizenbaum)

Transparency & The "Black Box" Problem: How can we trust the decisions of a deep learning system if we can't understand its reasoning?

How do humans react to simulated intelligence? (ELIZA)

🛡️ Data Privacy & Misinformation: How do we manage the use of personal data and combat AI-generated fake news and deepfakes at scale?

The pioneers saw the shadows on the horizon, but today, we are dealing with the complex reality of those shadows. They worried about the concept of machine judgment; we have to fix bias in actual machine judgments that are affecting lives right now.


3. 💬 The ELIZA Effect (1966): The Unsettling Power of Simulation As we've discussed before, Joseph Weizenbaum's chatbot ELIZA was designed to be a simple simulation of a therapist. But its effect on users was profound and, to Weizenbaum, deeply disturbing. The Ethical Revelation: Weizenbaum was horrified when he saw his colleagues, who knew ELIZA was just a simple program, confiding in it and forming emotional attachments. He saw people readily substituting a shallow simulation for genuine human connection. Weizenbaum's Warning: This experience turned him into one of AI's most prominent critics. He argued that there were certain roles—like therapist, judge, or caregiver—that machines should never fill, regardless of their capability. He believed that the very act of placing a machine in such a role would devalue human empathy and understanding. What it taught us: ELIZA was the first alarm bell for the social and psychological impact of AI. It raised critical questions about anthropomorphism, deception, and the appropriate boundaries for human-computer interaction. Weizenbaum's central question was not "Can a machine do this?" but "Should a machine do this?" 4. ↔️ Then vs. Now: A Comparison of Ethical Landscapes The early ethical questions were foundational, but the challenges we face today are far more complex and immediate. Early Ethical Questions Modern Ethical Challenges Can a machine be programmed not to harm us? (Asimov) 🤖 AI Alignment: How do we ensure a superintelligent AI's complex goals don't have unintended, harmful consequences? What is the societal impact of automation? (Wiener) ⚖️ Algorithmic Bias & Fairness: How do we prevent AI from amplifying societal biases in areas like hiring, lending, and criminal justice? Should a machine make certain human decisions? (Weizenbaum) Transparency & The "Black Box" Problem: How can we trust the decisions of a deep learning system if we can't understand its reasoning? How do humans react to simulated intelligence? (ELIZA) 🛡️ Data Privacy & Misinformation: How do we manage the use of personal data and combat AI-generated fake news and deepfakes at scale? The pioneers saw the shadows on the horizon, but today, we are dealing with the complex reality of those shadows. They worried about the concept of machine judgment; we have to fix bias in actual machine judgments that are affecting lives right now.

✨ The Enduring Questions

Were the early pioneers asking the right questions? In many ways, yes. Asimov, Wiener, and Weizenbaum gave us the essential grammar for AI ethics. They taught us to think about safety, societal impact, and the sanctity of human connection. Their questions were the right ones, even if they couldn't foresee the specific technical forms—like deep learning or large language models—that the challenges would take.


Their foresight is a crucial part of "the script that will save humanity." It reminds us that at the heart of every technical problem, there is a human one. Our task is to take their foundational questions about harm, control, and purpose, and apply them with rigor to the specific, complex, and high-stakes AI systems we are building today. They started the conversation; it is our solemn duty to continue it.


💬 Join the Conversation:

  1. 📖 Do you think Asimov's Three Laws are still a useful starting point for thinking about AI safety, even if they are flawed?

  2. ⚠️ Norbert Wiener warned about mass unemployment due to automation in 1950. Was his warning correct, just premature?

  3. 🤔 Weizenbaum believed some jobs should be off-limits for AI. Do you agree? If so, which ones?

  4. 📜 What ethical question do you think is most urgent for AI developers to address today?

We invite you to share your thoughts in the comments below!


📖 Glossary of Key Terms

  • ⚖️ AI Ethics: A branch of ethics that studies the moral behavior, and societal impact of artificial intelligence.

  • 📖 The Three Laws of Robotics: A set of rules devised by Isaac Asimov as a fictional framework for AI safety.

  • 警告 Cybernetics: The study of communication and control systems in living beings and machines, founded by Norbert Wiener.

  • 🎯 AI Alignment Problem: The challenge of ensuring that advanced AI systems pursue goals that are aligned with human values.

  • 💬 ELIZA Effect: The tendency for people to unconsciously attribute human-level understanding to a computer program, especially a chatbot.

  • 🤝 Anthropomorphism: The attribution of human traits, emotions, or intentions to non-human entities.


✨ The Enduring Questions Were the early pioneers asking the right questions? In many ways, yes. Asimov, Wiener, and Weizenbaum gave us the essential grammar for AI ethics. They taught us to think about safety, societal impact, and the sanctity of human connection. Their questions were the right ones, even if they couldn't foresee the specific technical forms—like deep learning or large language models—that the challenges would take. Their foresight is a crucial part of "the script that will save humanity." It reminds us that at the heart of every technical problem, there is a human one. Our task is to take their foundational questions about harm, control, and purpose, and apply them with rigor to the specific, complex, and high-stakes AI systems we are building today. They started the conversation; it is our solemn duty to continue it. 💬 Join the Conversation: 📖 Do you think Asimov's Three Laws are still a useful starting point for thinking about AI safety, even if they are flawed? ⚠️ Norbert Wiener warned about mass unemployment due to automation in 1950. Was his warning correct, just premature? 🤔 Weizenbaum believed some jobs should be off-limits for AI. Do you agree? If so, which ones? 📜 What ethical question do you think is most urgent for AI developers to address today? We invite you to share your thoughts in the comments below! 📖 Glossary of Key Terms ⚖️ AI Ethics: A branch of ethics that studies the moral behavior, and societal impact of artificial intelligence. 📖 The Three Laws of Robotics: A set of rules devised by Isaac Asimov as a fictional framework for AI safety. 警告 Cybernetics: The study of communication and control systems in living beings and machines, founded by Norbert Wiener. 🎯 AI Alignment Problem: The challenge of ensuring that advanced AI systems pursue goals that are aligned with human values. 💬 ELIZA Effect: The tendency for people to unconsciously attribute human-level understanding to a computer program, especially a chatbot. 🤝 Anthropomorphism: The attribution of human traits, emotions, or intentions to non-human entities.


Comments

bottom of page