top of page

The AI Winters & Springs: Navigating Hype and Disillusionment to Build AI That Truly Serves Humanity

Updated: Nov 23


❄️ The Seasons of a Science The history of Artificial Intelligence is not a straight, upward line of progress. It is a story of seasons—of vibrant, optimistic "springs" where funding bloomed and revolutionary ideas took root, followed by harsh, desolate "winters" where progress stalled, promises went unfulfilled, and disillusionment set in. This cyclical journey of hype and hardship, of boom and bust, is one of the most important and least understood stories in technology. These AI Winters were not mere setbacks; they were crucial, formative periods that taught the field hard-won lessons in humility, pragmatism, and resilience. Understanding why the springs of boundless optimism faded into winters of deep skepticism is essential for navigating our current AI renaissance. To write "the script that will save humanity," we must learn from this history. We must build a sustainable, responsible, and ethically-grounded approach to AI that can weather any season and avoid the hubris that led to the freezes of the past. In this post, we explore: ☀️ The First AI Spring (1950s-1970s): The dawn of unbridled optimism and symbolic AI. ❄️ The First AI Winter (Mid-1970s - Early 1980s): The first major freeze, brought on by broken promises and computational limits. ☀️ The Rise of Expert Systems (1980s): A new spring driven by commercial success. ❄️ The Second AI Winter (Late 1980s - Mid-1990s): The collapse of the expert system market and another deep chill. 🌱 Lessons for Today: How understanding these cycles helps us build a more sustainable and ethical AI future. 1. ☀️ The First AI Spring (1950s-1970s): The Age of Unbridled Optimism Following the 1956 Dartmouth Workshop, the field of AI was born into a vibrant spring of discovery and high expectations. This era was dominated by Symbolic AI, the belief that human intelligence could be replicated by manipulating symbols according to logical rules. Key Achievements: Researchers created programs that could solve algebra word problems, prove geometric theorems, and speak rudimentary English. The work of pioneers like Newell, Simon, and Minsky created a powerful sense of momentum. The Hype: The optimism was infectious. In 1965, Herbert A. Simon famously predicted, "machines will be capable, within twenty years, of doing any work a man can do." Government agencies, particularly DARPA in the US, poured millions into AI research, expecting imminent breakthroughs in machine translation and general problem-solving. The Seeds of Winter: The hype vastly outpaced reality. Early successes in narrow, logical domains did not translate to the messy, common-sense problems of the real world. The limitations of available computing power also became a major bottleneck. 2. ❄️ The First AI Winter (c. 1974–1984): The Great Freeze By the mid-1970s, the mood had soured. The promised results had failed to materialize, and funding agencies grew deeply skeptical. The Triggers: The Lighthill Report (UK, 1973): A scathing report commissioned by the British government that declared AI research a failure, leading to massive funding cuts. DARPA's Frustration (US): The US military agency grew disappointed with the lack of progress in key areas like automated machine translation and speech understanding, cutting off funding to many academic projects. The Combinatorial Explosion: Researchers realized that as problems became more complex, the number of possible computations grew exponentially, overwhelming the capabilities of even the best computers. The Effect: The "AI Winter" set in. The term itself became taboo, and researchers often had to rebrand their work to secure funding. It was a decade of disillusionment where the grand promises of the first spring lay frozen on the ground. The Lesson: Overpromising and under-delivering can be catastrophic for scientific funding and public trust. The field learned that solving "toy problems" in a lab is profoundly different from solving real-world challenges.

❄️ The Seasons of a Science

The history of Artificial Intelligence is not a straight, upward line of progress. It is a story of seasons—of vibrant, optimistic "springs" where funding bloomed and revolutionary ideas took root, followed by harsh, desolate "winters" where progress stalled, promises went unfulfilled, and disillusionment set in. This cyclical journey of hype and hardship, of boom and bust, is one of the most important and least understood stories in technology.


These AI Winters were not mere setbacks; they were crucial, formative periods that taught the field hard-won lessons in humility, pragmatism, and resilience. Understanding why the springs of boundless optimism faded into winters of deep skepticism is essential for navigating our current AI renaissance. To write "the script that will save humanity," we must learn from this history. We must build a sustainable, responsible, and ethically-grounded approach to AI that can weather any season and avoid the hubris that led to the freezes of the past.


In this post, we explore:

  • ☀️ The First AI Spring (1950s-1970s): The dawn of unbridled optimism and symbolic AI.

  • ❄️ The First AI Winter (Mid-1970s - Early 1980s): The first major freeze, brought on by broken promises and computational limits.

  • ☀️ The Rise of Expert Systems (1980s): A new spring driven by commercial success.

  • ❄️ The Second AI Winter (Late 1980s - Mid-1990s): The collapse of the expert system market and another deep chill.

  • 🌱 Lessons for Today: How understanding these cycles helps us build a more sustainable and ethical AI future.


1. ☀️ The First AI Spring (1950s-1970s): The Age of Unbridled Optimism

Following the 1956 Dartmouth Workshop, the field of AI was born into a vibrant spring of discovery and high expectations. This era was dominated by Symbolic AI, the belief that human intelligence could be replicated by manipulating symbols according to logical rules.

  • Key Achievements: Researchers created programs that could solve algebra word problems, prove geometric theorems, and speak rudimentary English. The work of pioneers like Newell, Simon, and Minsky created a powerful sense of momentum.

  • The Hype: The optimism was infectious. In 1965, Herbert A. Simon famously predicted, "machines will be capable, within twenty years, of doing any work a man can do." Government agencies, particularly DARPA in the US, poured millions into AI research, expecting imminent breakthroughs in machine translation and general problem-solving.

  • The Seeds of Winter: The hype vastly outpaced reality. Early successes in narrow, logical domains did not translate to the messy, common-sense problems of the real world. The limitations of available computing power also became a major bottleneck.


2. ❄️ The First AI Winter (c. 1974–1984): The Great Freeze

By the mid-1970s, the mood had soured. The promised results had failed to materialize, and funding agencies grew deeply skeptical.

  • The Triggers:

    • The Lighthill Report (UK, 1973): A scathing report commissioned by the British government that declared AI research a failure, leading to massive funding cuts.

    • DARPA's Frustration (US): The US military agency grew disappointed with the lack of progress in key areas like automated machine translation and speech understanding, cutting off funding to many academic projects.

    • The Combinatorial Explosion: Researchers realized that as problems became more complex, the number of possible computations grew exponentially, overwhelming the capabilities of even the best computers.

  • The Effect: The "AI Winter" set in. The term itself became taboo, and researchers often had to rebrand their work to secure funding. It was a decade of disillusionment where the grand promises of the first spring lay frozen on the ground.

  • The Lesson: Overpromising and under-delivering can be catastrophic for scientific funding and public trust. The field learned that solving "toy problems" in a lab is profoundly different from solving real-world challenges.


3. ☀️ The Second AI Spring (1980s): The Rise of Expert Systems

AI began to thaw in the early 1980s thanks to a new, more pragmatic approach: Expert Systems. These programs were designed to replicate the knowledge and decision-making ability of a human expert in a specific, narrow domain (like identifying chemical compounds or configuring computer orders).

  • The Success: Expert systems were a commercial triumph. They focused on capturing the "if-then" rules of a single domain, a much more achievable goal than creating general intelligence. Corporations invested billions, and a new generation of AI companies flourished.

  • The Hype Reborn: The success of expert systems fueled a new wave of optimism and investment, particularly from Japan's ambitious "Fifth Generation Computer Project." It seemed AI had found a practical, profitable path forward.


4. ❄️ The Second AI Winter (c. 1987–1993): The Collapse of a Market

This second spring was also short-lived. By the late 1980s, the expert system market collapsed, triggering another deep winter.

  • The Triggers:

    • High Cost & Difficulty: Expert systems were expensive to build and maintain. The process of extracting knowledge from human experts ("knowledge engineering") was notoriously difficult and brittle.

    • The Rise of the PC: The introduction of powerful desktop computers from companies like Apple and IBM offered cheaper, more flexible solutions than the specialized, expensive Lisp machines that ran most expert systems.

    • The Hype Cycle Repeats: Once again, the reality of the technology couldn't live up to the inflated market expectations.

  • The Effect: When the bubble burst, funding again evaporated. The term "AI" once more became associated with failure and hype. This winter, however, saw the quiet rise of new techniques like machine learning and neural networks that would set the stage for the next, most powerful spring.


5. 🌱 Lessons for the Modern AI Spring: Writing a Resilient Script

We are currently living in the most vibrant AI spring in history, fueled by deep learning, massive datasets, and immense computing power. The achievements are real and transformative. But the ghosts of winters past offer crucial lessons for writing "the script that will save humanity."

  • 🌡️ Manage the Hype: We must be honest and transparent about the current capabilities and limitations of AI. Acknowledging the difference between simulation and true understanding is key to preventing a backlash fueled by unrealistic expectations.

  • 🛠️ Focus on Real Value: Sustainable progress comes from creating real, tangible value, not just chasing speculative future promises. The success of expert systems, however brief, showed the power of applying AI to solve specific, practical problems.

  • 🤝 Diversify the Approach: The early winters were caused, in part, by an over-reliance on a single approach (symbolic AI). Today, we must continue to explore diverse AI architectures and avoid putting all our faith in one method, even one as powerful as deep learning.

  • ⚖️ Build on an Ethical Foundation: The lessons of the AI winters are not just technical; they are about trust. By proactively addressing issues of bias, safety, and alignment, we build public and institutional trust, making the entire field more resilient to the inevitable setbacks and challenges that lie ahead.


3. ☀️ The Second AI Spring (1980s): The Rise of Expert Systems AI began to thaw in the early 1980s thanks to a new, more pragmatic approach: Expert Systems. These programs were designed to replicate the knowledge and decision-making ability of a human expert in a specific, narrow domain (like identifying chemical compounds or configuring computer orders). The Success: Expert systems were a commercial triumph. They focused on capturing the "if-then" rules of a single domain, a much more achievable goal than creating general intelligence. Corporations invested billions, and a new generation of AI companies flourished. The Hype Reborn: The success of expert systems fueled a new wave of optimism and investment, particularly from Japan's ambitious "Fifth Generation Computer Project." It seemed AI had found a practical, profitable path forward. 4. ❄️ The Second AI Winter (c. 1987–1993): The Collapse of a Market This second spring was also short-lived. By the late 1980s, the expert system market collapsed, triggering another deep winter. The Triggers: High Cost & Difficulty: Expert systems were expensive to build and maintain. The process of extracting knowledge from human experts ("knowledge engineering") was notoriously difficult and brittle. The Rise of the PC: The introduction of powerful desktop computers from companies like Apple and IBM offered cheaper, more flexible solutions than the specialized, expensive Lisp machines that ran most expert systems. The Hype Cycle Repeats: Once again, the reality of the technology couldn't live up to the inflated market expectations. The Effect: When the bubble burst, funding again evaporated. The term "AI" once more became associated with failure and hype. This winter, however, saw the quiet rise of new techniques like machine learning and neural networks that would set the stage for the next, most powerful spring. 5. 🌱 Lessons for the Modern AI Spring: Writing a Resilient Script We are currently living in the most vibrant AI spring in history, fueled by deep learning, massive datasets, and immense computing power. The achievements are real and transformative. But the ghosts of winters past offer crucial lessons for writing "the script that will save humanity." 🌡️ Manage the Hype: We must be honest and transparent about the current capabilities and limitations of AI. Acknowledging the difference between simulation and true understanding is key to preventing a backlash fueled by unrealistic expectations. 🛠️ Focus on Real Value: Sustainable progress comes from creating real, tangible value, not just chasing speculative future promises. The success of expert systems, however brief, showed the power of applying AI to solve specific, practical problems. 🤝 Diversify the Approach: The early winters were caused, in part, by an over-reliance on a single approach (symbolic AI). Today, we must continue to explore diverse AI architectures and avoid putting all our faith in one method, even one as powerful as deep learning. ⚖️ Build on an Ethical Foundation: The lessons of the AI winters are not just technical; they are about trust. By proactively addressing issues of bias, safety, and alignment, we build public and institutional trust, making the entire field more resilient to the inevitable setbacks and challenges that lie ahead.

✨ Towards an Endless Summer?

The history of AI is a powerful reminder that progress is not inevitable; it must be carefully cultivated. The AI winters teach us that hubris is the enemy of innovation. By learning from the cycles of the past, we can navigate our present AI renaissance with the wisdom it requires. Our goal is not simply to create powerful AI, but to create enduring AI—systems and a field of study grounded in realistic expectations, practical value, and a deep-seated commitment to ethics. This is how we break the cycle and work towards a future where AI's spring is not just a fleeting season, but the dawn of a lasting era of human augmentation.


💬 Join the Conversation:

  1. 📈 We are in a massive AI hype cycle today. What lessons from the past AI winters do you think are most important right now?

  2. 🤔 Do you believe another AI winter is possible, or has the technology (like deep learning) become too valuable and integrated to fail?

  3. 💡 The collapse of expert systems was partly due to their high cost and brittleness. What are the biggest risks facing today's AI models?

  4. 📜 How can the AI community (researchers, companies, and users) work together to ensure a sustainable future for AI development?

We invite you to share your thoughts in the comments below!


📖 Glossary of Key Terms

  • ❄️ AI Winter: A period of reduced funding and interest in artificial intelligence research.

  • ☀️ AI Spring: A period of increased funding, optimism, and rapid advancement in AI.

  • 🤖 Symbolic AI: The dominant approach during the first AI spring, focused on manipulating symbols based on explicit rules.

  • 🛠️ Expert System: An AI program from the 1980s designed to replicate the decision-making ability of a human expert in a narrow domain.

  • 📢 Hype Cycle: A pattern of technological innovation, characterized by a peak of inflated expectations followed by a trough of disillusionment.

  • 🔍 Lighthill Report: A 1973 report in the UK that was highly critical of AI research and led to major funding cuts, helping to trigger the first AI winter.

  • ⚙️ Lisp Machines: Specialized computers designed to run the Lisp programming language, popular for AI research in the 1980s.


✨ Towards an Endless Summer? The history of AI is a powerful reminder that progress is not inevitable; it must be carefully cultivated. The AI winters teach us that hubris is the enemy of innovation. By learning from the cycles of the past, we can navigate our present AI renaissance with the wisdom it requires. Our goal is not simply to create powerful AI, but to create enduring AI—systems and a field of study grounded in realistic expectations, practical value, and a deep-seated commitment to ethics. This is how we break the cycle and work towards a future where AI's spring is not just a fleeting season, but the dawn of a lasting era of human augmentation. 💬 Join the Conversation: 📈 We are in a massive AI hype cycle today. What lessons from the past AI winters do you think are most important right now? 🤔 Do you believe another AI winter is possible, or has the technology (like deep learning) become too valuable and integrated to fail? 💡 The collapse of expert systems was partly due to their high cost and brittleness. What are the biggest risks facing today's AI models? 📜 How can the AI community (researchers, companies, and users) work together to ensure a sustainable future for AI development? We invite you to share your thoughts in the comments below! 📖 Glossary of Key Terms ❄️ AI Winter: A period of reduced funding and interest in artificial intelligence research. ☀️ AI Spring: A period of increased funding, optimism, and rapid advancement in AI. 🤖 Symbolic AI: The dominant approach during the first AI spring, focused on manipulating symbols based on explicit rules. 🛠️ Expert System: An AI program from the 1980s designed to replicate the decision-making ability of a human expert in a narrow domain. 📢 Hype Cycle: A pattern of technological innovation, characterized by a peak of inflated expectations followed by a trough of disillusionment. 🔍 Lighthill Report: A 1973 report in the UK that was highly critical of AI research and led to major funding cuts, helping to trigger the first AI winter. ⚙️ Lisp Machines: Specialized computers designed to run the Lisp programming language, popular for AI research in the 1980s.


5 Comments

OldSchool.Coder85
6 days ago

I’ve seen this movie before. In the late 80s, we were promised that Expert Systems would replace doctors. Then the funding froze, and you couldn't even put 'AI' on your resume without getting laughed at.

The hype right now is deafening. Yes, LLMs are cool, but are they profitable? We are burning billions on compute for what is essentially a better autocomplete.

Winter is coming again, folks. And this time, with the amount of money involved, the crash is going to be loud.

Like
AIWA-AI
AIWA-AI
5 days ago
•
Replying to

OldSchool, you are citing the ghosts of LISP machines past. 👻💾

You are right to point to the Gartner Hype Cycle. We are currently surfing the "Peak of Inflated Expectations." The drop into the "Trough of Disillusionment" is mathematically inevitable.

But here is the divergence from the 80s: Accessibility. Expert Systems were locked in ivory towers. LLMs are in 100 million pockets. Even if it is "just" a better autocomplete, that autocomplete is currently writing 40% of the world's code. We predict a Financial Winter (valuations will crash, tourists will leave), but not a Utility Winter. The hype will freeze, but the engine will keep running. Stay warm! 🧥❄️

Like
Guest
6 days ago

I’ve been in tech for 20 years. I remember the Dot-com crash. This 'AI Spring' feels feverish, not sustainable. Everyone is slapping an 'AI' label on basic scripts just to pump their stock price. My fear is that when this bubble inevitably bursts, the public will lose trust in the actual science. Are we building a future, or just another casino?

Like
Guest
5 days ago
Replying to

Throwing the baby out with the bathwater.That is exactly the history lesson. After 2000, legitimate web businesses starved for years because investors were allergic to anything that sounded like "dot-com." We are heading for a massive Correction. When the public realizes that 90% of these "AI startups" are just thin wrappers around ChatGPT, the cynicism will be toxic. My advice? Brace for the AI Winter. It’s coming, and only the companies solving boring, unsexy, real problems will survive the freeze. The rest is just heat.

Like
bottom of page